What NON-Muslims Say
“The world may wish to look away or hide the truth but eventually it comes to the surface. The “Jihad” is global and coming to a neighborhood near you very soon. So call it by another name – “disenfranchised youth” or “freedom fighters” – or stay silent, but either way you will end up having to deal with the problem.The real threat comes from within. It comes from all the governments who have been overtaken by those who are self-hating. These liberals/socialists/communists want not only to deny the problem but make us feel as if it is our fault and we are repeating the lies everyday on television and in newspapers.Make no mistake, Paris is only the tip of the iceberg. Islam is a conquering religion and ideology, tolerant at times and perfectly fit for those who unconsciously embrace the Darwinian theory: survival of the fittest. This is how Islam has succeeded in creating a vast empire comprising over 1.2 billion people in more than 60 countries all over the world. Islam deserves our admiration.Western Christian Europe is doomed. The hypocrisy of the Europeans brought upon themselves this Euro-intifada. It has nothing to do with jobs or integration. In time, the only solution will be a change in the nature of Europe. No more a Christian stronghold, but at best a territory shared with Islam, until such time when demographics makes the entirety of Europe Islamic. France, and for that matter the rest of Europe, could create as many jobs as they want. It won’t change anything. This phenomenon is existential. Even if authorities succeed in calming the spirits momentarily, this phenomenon will reoccur, because that’s the way the world is evolving.As Theodore Dalrymple explained in his Autumn 2002 City Journal essay, The Barbarians at the Gates of Paris, the Muslim youth rioting today feel nothing but nihilistic or Islamic hatred from their country and their countrymen. In his words, “They are of France, but not French.” Dalrymple explained that the bloated French welfare state houses, clothes, feeds and pays its unassimilated immigrant communities in a manner that enables disaffected youth to “enjoy a far higher standard of living (or consumption) than they would in countries of their parents’ or grandparents’ origin, even if they labored there 14 hours a day to the maximum of their capacity.”” MALAY BISHOPS : warn flock against shariah law effect on marriage to a Muslim, ie. once you become Muslim through marriage, your new ID card will register you as a Muslim. If you want to revert back to your old religion, you will have to go through the courts and prove that you have never lived as a Muslim or never practised the Islamic faith. Your Muslim-born spouse will never be able to change his/her faith. If he/she tries, he/she will be considered a Muslim apostate and given 3 days to repent and return to Islam, otherwise, he/she will be required to join a state ‘re-education class’ or given a jail sentence or both. You or your Muslim spouse will be buried as a Muslim, even if he/she never or refused to practise it. There have been cases in Malaysia where the state seized dead bodies against the wishes of the relatives, because the state had reason to believe that the deceaseds were Muslims. In case of a divorce from a Muslim spouse, unless you succesfully revoked your Muslim identity from your identity card, you will not be able to marry a person other than a Muslim & your children will be automatically considered a Muslim & will be educated as Muslims regardless of their objection.
The shariah’s most important rules : (1) Your religion is a NOT a personal matter, it is a matter of the state, (2) ONCE A MUSLIM, ALWAYS A MUSLIM. Your Muslim-born spouse or your Muslim-born children may TRY to sue the state for refusing to change the word Muslim in your ID card. LINA JOY tried for 15 years, went all the way to the Supreme Court and failed. She had to go into hiding due to death threaths and is now applying for asylum in another country.
Other shariah requirements (as stated in the Quran) : Marriage in Islam is not a sacrament but a contract. Your Muslim wife will require you to become Muslim, because Muslim women are forbidden from marrying non-Muslims. Your Muslim husband will not require you, but only your children, to become Muslims; he can beat you if (see Q4:34), he can take more than one wife, he can divorce you without giving any valid reasons by saying ‘I divorce you’ (3X) even by text message, whilst YOU (the wife) have to seek divorce throught the courts; your divorced husband will allow you to keep the children only until they are 7 (or 11) years old, his shariah obligation is to pay you maintenance for no longer than 3 months. IF you wish to return to your divorced Muslim husband, you have to marry somebody else first, consummate that marriage, divorce that second husband and only THEN return to your ex-husband.
Sir Winston Churchill, UK :
‘Cum spaima este blestemul care Mohammedanism pune pe discipoli. Efectul este aparent in multe tari. Imbunatatirea obiceiului, sistemul sleampat in agricultura, metodele lente in comert si pesiguranta propreitatii exista oriunde discipolii de la Profet cu reguli sau viata. In realitate, in legea Mohammedana fiecare femeie trebuie sa apartina unui barbat ca fiind propretatea lui, oricare ca copil, ca sotie sau ca concubina, trebuie sa amane finalul disparitiei de slavie pana can lupta a islamului inceteaza sa fie o putere absoluta intre barbati.’
[‘How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! … The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.’]
December, 1926, MAHATMA GANDHI had said: “Mussalmans have an ordeal to pass through. There can be no doubt that they are too free with the knife and the pistol. The sword is an emblem of Islam. But Islam was born in an environment where the sword was, and still remains, the supreme law. … The sword is yet too much in evidence among the Mussalmans. It must be sheathed if Islam is to be what it means – peace.”
President G W Bush, USA: ‘Ei incearca sa raspandeasca mesajul jihadului un mesaj care i-as spune in totalitaritate. Radicalismul islamic – Fascismul islamic. Acesta este inceputul al unei lungi lupote impotriva ideologiei care este reala si profunda. Este fascismul islamic. Vine in diferita forme. Ei impart aceleasi taetici, care sa distruga lumea si lucrurile in ordine sa creeze haos si cu speranta in viziunea lor ca vor predomina lumea si Estul Mijlociu.’
[‘…They try to spread their jihadist message — a message I call, it’s totalitarian in nature — Islamic radicalism, Islamic fascism … This is the beginning of a long struggle against an ideology that is real and profound. It’s Islamo-fascism. It comes in different forms. They share the same tactics, which is to destroy people and things in order to create chaos in the hopes that their vision of the world become predominant in the Middle East.’]
French president, SARKOZY : ‘In Franta, noi respectam pe acei ce rpractica islamul. Doresc tarilor cu musulmani majoritari sa aibe acelasi respect pentru diferente si identitatea altor persoane.’
[‘In France, we respect those who practice Islam. I wish countries with Muslim majorities had the same respect for differences and other people’s identities.’]
Ministrul Emigrantilor Olanda, Rita Verdonk (cu PM Balkenende) declara in parlament asta “timpul in care se bea ceaiul” cu grupul Musulman a trecut.
[Rita Verdonk declared in parliament that the “time of cosy tea-drinking” with Muslim groups had passed.]
Ex PM Spania, Jose Maria Aznar :
‘Musulmani trebuie sa se scuze pentru ocuparea Spaniei pentru 800 ani. Musulmani nicidodata nu sau scuzat pentru asta dar inca cere scuze oricand ei simt pfensati de remarcile ne-musulmanilor. Este absurd.’
[Ex PM Spain: “Muslims should apologize for occupying Spain for 800 years. Muslims had never apologized for this but still demand apologies whenever they feel offended by remarks by non-Muslims. It’s absurd.”]
Ex-Muslim Ibn Warraq : ‘Musulmani sunt moderati, islamul nu e.’ [‘Muslims are moderate, Islam is NOT.’]
Fr Piersandro Vanzan : ‘Islamismul este un convenient calificat. Noi folosim sa spunem ‘islamul militant‘ sau ‘musulmani fundamentalisti’ sau altfel calificati sa nu condamne singuri islamul. [DAR] islamul moderat nu exista pentru ca acolo nu este instituit sau moderat pentru o teologie a islamului.’
[‘Islamist‘ is a convenient qualifier. We used to say ‘militant Islam’ or ‘Muslim fundamentalists’ or other such qualifiers so as not to condemn Islam itself. [BUT] Moderate Islam does not exist because there is no institutional and moderate form of Islamic theology.’]
NO PHOTO !
SAMUEL P. HUNTINGTON : Islam’s borders are bloody and so are its innards. The fundamental problem for the West is not Islamic fundamentalism. It is Islam, a different civilisation whose people are convinced of the superiority of their culture and are obsessed with the inferiority of their power —— Huntington’s 1998 text The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order.
Attorney General John Ashcroft (USA) : ‘Islamul este o religie in care Dumnezeu asteapta ca fiul tau sa moara pentru el. Crestinismul este o religie in care Dumnezeu a timis pe fiul sau sa moara pentru tine.’
[‘Islam is a religion in which God expects your son to die for him. Christianity is a religion in which God sent His Son to die for you.’]
Hilaire Belloc, istoria catolicilor, UK, prezice in 1937 ca noi nu am mai vazut un rezultat de 12 secole militari crestini incapabili impotriva islamului: ‘Islamul a pastrat in principal sufletul si de aceea este material drept care se intoarce. In cealalta parte, Europa este desintegrata, pentru plomba crestina care impreuna a fost faramitat. Si in acest mare contast spiritual mintand marele mnostru risc pentru islam inca aztazi.’
[Hilaire Belloc, Catholic historian, UK predicted in 1937 that we have not seen the last of the results of the 12th-century Christian military failure against Islam: “Islam has in the main preserved it’s soul and that therefore it’s material strength may return. On the other hand, Europe is disintegrating, for the Christian cement which held it together has crumbled. And in that great spiritual contrast lies our great peril from Islam yet today.”]
General Sir Richard Dannatt, UK:
‘Cind vad cum islamisti trateaza in aceasta tara sper ca nu vor face progres exagerat pentru ca acolo este un moral si spiritual aspirator in aceasta tara … Societatea noasra are mereu sa fie … in valorile crestine, odata ce ai tras ancora sus acolo este un pericol ce societatea noastra o muta cu rasuflare triumfatoare. Noua ne trebuie sa privim in sus la tratamentul islamist, sa alegem cine actioneza in numele islamului si in a perverti drumul incearca sa impui islamului cu forta in societate ceea ce nu ne dorim. Este trist ca traim in serviciul societatii crestine. Gandesc ca e o mare rusine intinsa traditie iudaica-crestina a fost societatea Britanica.’
[‘When I see the Islamist threat in this country I hope it doesn’t make undue progress because there is a moral and spiritual vacuum in this country… Our society has always been embedded in Christian values; once you have pulled the anchor up there is a danger that our society moves with the prevailing wind… We need to face up to the Islamist threat, to those who act in the name of Islam and in a perverted way try to impose Islam by force on societies that do not wish it. It is said that we live in a post Christian society. I think that is a great shame. The broader Judaic-Christian tradition has underpinned British society. It underpins the British army.’]
Paul Goodman MP, UK
November 2006 : in a speech in the House of Commons has articulated perfectly the threat posed by Islam to the peace and safety of this Realm. His constituency is High Wycombe (11% Muslim) which was the focus of the plot to simultaneously bomb a number of transatlantic flights in a terrorist spectacular that would have equalled the bombing of the World Trade Centre.
The Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, UK
Noiembrie 2006 : Episcopal de Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, a dat un interviu in The Times in care el expune inconstienta, schizofrenia si ipoerizia a multor musulmanii. El ii acuza de standarde duble in arderea lumii pentru propaganda a “doua psihologi” in care ei de la amandoua “victima si dominatie.”
[The Bishop of Rochester, Michael Nazir-Ali, has given an interview to The Times in which he exposes the inconsistency, schizophrenia and hypocrisy of many Muslims. He accuses them of double standards in their view of the world for propagating a ‘dual psychology’ in which they sought both ‘victimhood and domination’.]
Amir Taheri : “To understand a civilisation it is important to understand its vocabulary. If it was not on their tongues it is likely that it was not on their minds either. There was no word in any of the Muslim languages for democracy until the 1890s. Democracy as the proverbial schoolboy would know is based on one fundamental principle: equality. The idea is unacceptable to Islam. For the non-believer cannot be the equal of the believer.“
Meanwhile, meet the European USEFUL IDIOTS, or the Dhimmies of Islam:
Prince Charles of UK, alias Sheikh Al Wales. Cina doreste sa care titlul Aparator al Tuturor Luptelor (asa include Islam), in loc de Aparator a Luptii (crestinismul, ca toti regii britanici si regine sint chia dupa vremea lui Henry VII) cand el a luat peste pentru regina. Remarcile lui odesea apara legea islamica, mandru de a lui gradina islamica in Highgrove si este ‘tinuta de islam.’
Poate HRH iar placea so scufunde Coroana imperiala continand ca emblema a cruce cu diamante pentry turban ? HRH’s motto a devenit putere : Ich Dien Allah und Muhamadur Rasulullah !
Poate Regina Elizabeth II trai o foarte foarte lunga durata. Viata lunga Reginei !
[The Prince of Wales, who wishes to carry the title Defender of ALL Faiths (so as to include ISLAM), instead of Defender of THE Faith (ie Christianity, as all British kings and queens are since Henry VII) when he takes over from the Queen. His remarks often defended Islamic law, praised the status of Muslim women, sees in Islam a solution for Britain’s ailments, proud of his Islamic garden in Highgrove and is ‘fond of Islam’.
Maybe HRH would like to swap the Imperial Crown containing a Cross embellished with diamonds for a turban ? HRH’s motto might become : Ich Dien Allah und Muhammadur Rasulullah … God forbid ! May Queen Elizabeth II live a very very long time. Long Live the Queen !
Piet Hein Donner, Ministru justitie in OLANDA spune el ar fi binevenita legea islamica, sau Sharia, daca majoritatea persoanelor voteaza pentru el. Pe care ministrul emigrantilor olandez Rita verdonk raspunde, “Democratia noastra este mult mai mare decat puterea majoritatii. Lumea lumineaza pentru ani, pentru valorile fundamentale. Aceasta azbitura cu Sharia (!)]
[The Netherlands’ justice minister says he would welcome Islamic law, or Sharia, if the majority of his people vote for it. Upon which Dutch Immigration minister Rita Verdonk responded : “Our democracy is much more than the might of the majority. People fought for years for fundamental values. These jar with Sharia (!)”]
Jens Orback, Minister for Democracy, Metropolitan Affairs, Integration and Gender Equality from the Swedish Social Democratic Party during a debate in Swedish radio. We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”