SIOE-Romania

Racism is the lowest form of human stupidity, but Islamophobia is the height of common sense

  • March 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Meta

  • Papa Benedict XVI :

    "Aratati-mi doar ce Muhammad a adus nou si o sa gasesti numai lucruri rele si inumane, asa ca el comanda sa imprastie sabii pentru lupta el predica." (Quoting 14th century Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos)
  • Regina Margareta a Danemarcii:

    "Noi am fost provocati de islam acesti ani. Gloal ca si local. Este o provocare pe care trebuie sa o luam in serios. Noi am permis sa lasam aceasta problema sa pluteasca prea mult timp pentru ca suntem prea toleranti si lenesi. Noi trebuie sa aratam opozitia noastra islamului si noi avem acum o perioada riscanta, hotarata, etichetata pusa pe noi pentru ca acolo cateva lucruri pentru care noi trebuie sa ne expunem si sa nu toleram. Si cand noi suntem toleranti, noi trebuie sa stim sa infrunteam pentru convenienta ((pentru ca e usor) sau convingere (pentru ca noi sa ne convingem)."
  • Regele Ibn Saud, Arabia Saudita

    “Verily, the word of Allah teaches us, and we implicitly believe it, that for a Muslim to KILL A JEW, or for him to be killed by a Jew, ensures him immediate entry into Heaven and into the august presence of Allah.” (1937) -Foarte, lumea lui Allah ne invata pe noi, si noi implicit credem, asta pentru musulmani sa UCIDA UN EVREU, sau pentru el sa fie ucis de un evreu, ii asigura lui imediat intrarea in Rai si intrarea in august in prezemta lui Allah (1937)- “The Democratic system that is predominant in the world is not a suitable system for the peoples of our region…….The system of free election is NOT suitable to our country.” -Sistimul democratie este predominant in lume nu este un sistem potrivit pentru lumea din regiunea noastra. Sistemul de alegeri libere nu este potrivit pentru tara noastra-
  • Profetul Muhamed spune :

    ”No Muslim should be killed for killing a Kafir” (infidel) - "Nu musulmani trebuie sa fie ucisi pentru uciderea kafirului (infidelitatii)" Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol 9:50 ... “Daca musulmanii delibereaza crima, alti musulmani cad sub legea vendeta si trebuie legal sa fie pusi la moarte de rudele apropiate. Dar daca un nemusulman care moare in mainile musulmanilor trebuie oproape toata viata sa fie de obicei nemusulman, penaltiul cu moartea nu este valid. In loc ca musulmanii sa fie criminali, artrebui sa plateasca cu bine si trebuies pedepsiti cu bicuire ... De cand islamul a considerat nemusulmanii ca pe un nivel micsorat al credintei si convigerii, daca un musulman ucide un nemusulman atuci pedeapsa lui trebuie sa nu fie una cu moartea, de cand lupta si convingerea care o poseda el este mareata atungi asta este de la barbatul nimicilor … Islam si poporul sa fie pe deasupra infideli si niciodata sa nu permita nemusulmanilor sa dobandeasca barea Domnului pentru ei.” — Sultanhussein Tabandeh, A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, F. J. Goulding, translator, London, 1970.
  • Mustafa Kemal Ataturk:

    “Turcii sint o natiune buna chiar dinainte ca ei sa adopte islamul. Adeasta religie nu ajuta arabii, iranienii, egiptenii si altele sa uneasca cu turcii intr-o natiune. Transformarea a stabilit turcii in relatiile nationale; a amortit nationalitatea turceasca sentimental si entuziasmal. Acesta a fost natural pentru Mohamedaism care a fost bazat pe nationalism inaintea tuturor nationalitatilor” 1930s Primul Ministru turc, Recep Tayyip Erdogan: “Minaretii sint sabiile noastre, soarte sint vindecarea, moscheele sint casele noastre, credinciosii sint soldatii nostrii. 1999
  • Ce Spune Musulmanii ‘Moderat’ :

    Profesorul M A din indonezia Universitatea islamica Syarif Hidayatullah: “Este adevarat ca acolo este certitudine islamica perceputa care nu este compatibila cu drepturile omului universale” In islamic Malaezia “moderat”: numai musulmanii sunt ca cetatenii malaezieni. Noiembrie 2007: Profesorul malaezian Mohamed Hashim Kamali, in Maldive pentru ca a sfatuit in amendamentul din constitutie, a spus clar ca idea ca ‘nimenii nu poate fi cetatean Maldivian, cu exceptia musulmanilor’ este 100% islamic.
  • [EX-Algerian President] Houari Boumedienne :

    In 1974 spoke before the General Assembly of the United Nations : "One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere of this planet to burst into the northern one. But not as friends. Because they will burst in to conquer, and they will conquer by populating it with their children. Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women." -In 1974, a vorbit Generalul Assembly al Natiunilor Unite: "O data milioane de barbati vor pleca din emisfera sudica a planetei sa explodeze in emisfera nordica. Dar nu ca prieteni. Pentru ca ei vor exploda ca sa cucereasca, si ei vor cuceri inmultindu-se cu copii lor. Victoria va veni la noi din pantecele femeilor noastre-
  • More Quotations from Prominent Muslims :

    Curtea suprema a Pakistanului, Muhammad Taqi Usmani : “Musulmanii trebuie sa traiasca LINISTITI in tari ca Marea Britanie, unde lor le trebuie libertate sa practice islamismul, NUMAI pana cand castiga destula putere sa se angreneze in lupta. Jihadul (agresiv) este legal si permisibil impotriva nemusulmanilor din tarile generoase care au permis predica islamului. Chiar in aceste zile (de Muhamad) AGRESIUNE JIHADULUI ESTE AMENTITATA … pentru ca a fost SINCER COMANDATA PENTRU STABILITATE SI GRANDOARE DE RELIGIA LUI ALLAH.” Saudi cleric, Sheikh Saleh al-Fozan : “There are no, neither will be, any liberal muslims. When there are muslims hoping for liberal islam, they can forget it. Liberal islam goes against the will of allah”

Shariah in Europe = back to barbarism

Posted by antikafirphobia on March 28, 2008

Libyan Muslim on Statements by UK Archbishop of Canterbury : ‘If Europe adopts Shariah, it will Revert to Pre-Englightenment Era’

In a February 26, 2008 article in the Arab liberal e-journal Elaph, Libyan-European liberal thinker and entrepreneur Muhammad ‘Abd Al-Muttalib Al-Houni wrote that the recent statements by Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Rowan Williams on implementing shari’a law in Britain constituted dangerous encouragement to fundamentalists in their war against the Enlightenment. He added that such statements could have very grave repercussions for the struggle for freedom in Muslim countries as well.

The following are excerpts from Al-Houni’s article:

Would Europe Have Islamic Courts, or Would We Send European Judges to the Taliban to Learn Shari’a?

“I recently read a statement by the head of the Anglican Church [Archbishop of Canterbury Dr. Rowan Williams], the upshot of which was that there was nothing wrong with the British legal system adopting some laws from Islamic shari’a and their implementing them for British citizens of the Islamic faith.

… “I imagine that the archbishop is referring [only] to Islamic shari’a laws regarding personal status. So let us imagine these laws being implemented in European courts.

“First of all, on the procedural side, there would need to be Islamic courts in European countries to adjudicate in all disputes involving European Muslim citizens – or else a large number of European judges would have to be sent to the Taliban to learn shari’a thoroughly enough to implement its laws.

“Also, European countries seeking to implement shari’a would need to submit their reservations regarding any international conventions they may have signed. This is because they will have to:

“1) Permit polygamy for European Muslim citizens, and not punish them for it – [even though] this is considered criminal under European law;

“2) Permit European Muslim citizens to beat their wives to discipline them, as the Koran urges;

“3) Allow men to unilaterally decide to divorce without requiring any court proceedings, as this is a right guaranteed [to men] by shari’a;

“4) Give daughters [only] half the inheritance rights that sons have, while widows receive only an eighth of the inheritance;

“5) [Not] consider women’s testimony the equal of men’s in shari’a courts;

“6) Deprive a divorced woman of custody of her children if she remarries;

“7) Allow European Muslim citizens to marry in traditional marriages without the need to officially register these marriages;

“8) Eliminate adoption, since it is contrary to shari’a;

“9) Force a woman whose Muslim husband converts to another religion to divorce him, because he is an apostate;

“10) Prevent European Muslim women from marrying non-Muslims…”

Adopting Shari’a Would Undermine the Concept of Citizenship

“If [Archbishop Rowan’s] intention is to introduce some or all of these laws from Islamic shari’a into Europe’s legal systems, it would mean the following:

“1) The concept of citizenship in Europe will change. There will be [different] classes of citizenship and of citizens, with some citizens being exempt from having the general law applied to them because they belong to a particular religion or belief. There will be a Muslim [class of] citizen, a Christian [class of] citizen, a Buddhist [class of] citizen, a Confucian [class of] citizen, and so on. Each will apply his own laws… Thus, faith will not be an individual freedom or belief; it will [come to] have extremely serious public ramifications.

“2) If some or all of these laws were implemented and recognized by European legislative bodies, it would not only seriously damage human rights legislation – it would spell the end [of this legislation]. This is because everything I mentioned above is a negation of human rights principles.

“3) Recognizing all, or [even] some, of these laws would take European societies back to the age before the Enlightenment and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As a result, the West would revert to barbarism.”

Britain’s latest Useful Idiot and DHIMMI, the Archbishop of Canterbury : soooo CRAZY about Shariah, the Muslims THEMSELVES do not even want !

TRANSLATION :

Shari’a in Eropa = Inapoi La Barbarism

Musulman Libia exprima alaturi de Arhiepiscopul   de Canterbury UK : daca Europa adpta Shari’a, o sa revina la pre-era Enlightenment

In 26 Februari 2008, un articol in jurnalul Elaph al arabilor liberali – Libieni – europeanii
liberali gandesc, Muhammad ‘Abd Al-Muttalib Al-Houni scrie ca exprimarea  recenta de catre Arhiepiscopul   de Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, despre ndeplinerea legii Shari’a in Marea Britanie constitue un pericol incurajat di fundamentalisti, in  raboiul olor impotriva Enlightenment. El adauga asta asa afirmati poate avea foarte grave repercursiuni pentru lupta pentru libertae si in tarile muslmane deasemenea.

3 Responses to “Shariah in Europe = back to barbarism”

  1. allysonrt said

    great blog. Great info. Check out my blog regarding Shariah finance and how the world is selling out the Jihadis’ and Islamists.

    http://shariahfinancewatch.wordpress.com

  2. Ferris Schuster said

    No, Sharia does not mean to turn back to barbarity of European dark ages, since even in the dark ages Europe didn’t know such barbarity. The complete suppression of the free thought means the death of man and mankind.
    I think – therefore, I live (Descartes)
    will be replaced by:
    I live (or, better – I survive), because I don’t think

  3. Ferris Schuster said

    Rowan Williams deserves to be stripped of his priesthood and thrown away from Christian brotherhood altogether, branded as a Traitor Of Christianity And The World Culture. It is very likely that he already sevretly converted to Islam.
    Episcopals everywhere are better to convert to other Christian denominations and put an end such shameful fake church, that even in England is highly unpopular.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: